Enhancing Early Literacy: The Effect of Flashcard-Based Learning Media on Consonant Letter Recognition in Early Childhood Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v5i1.208Keywords:
Early Literacy, Flashcard Media, Consonant Letters, Early childhood education, Letter Recognition, Visual Discrimination, Mirror LettersAbstract
Visual discrimination of letters with similar graphic forms (e.g., b, d, p, q) presents a significant cognitive challenge in early childhood literacy development. This study investigates the effect of flashcard-based learning media on enhancing consonant letter recognition among young learners. Utilizing a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design spanning two iterative cycles, the intervention involved 15 children aged 4–5 years at a purposively selected early childhood education center in Indonesia. Data were gathered through structured observations, semi-structured teacher interviews, and pedagogical documentation. The findings revealed a progressive improvement in children’s letter recognition and visual differentiation capabilities. The mastery rate increased significantly from a baseline of 26.67% in the pre-cycle stage to 53.33% in Cycle I, ultimately achieving 80.00% in Cycle II. The integration of high-contrast, interactive flashcards combined with game-based learning effectively mitigated mirror-letter confusion by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visual retention. Furthermore, the approach stimulated active participation and learning motivation. These results suggest that structured visual media serve as a critical scaffold for early orthographic processing. This study contributes to early childhood pedagogy by providing an empirical framework for addressing specific letter-reversal difficulties through targeted visual stimulation.
References
Alabood, L., Dow, T., Feeley, K. B., Jaswal, V. K., & Krishnamurthy, D. (2024). From Letterboards to Holograms: Advancing Assistive Technology for Nonspeaking Autistic Individuals with the HoloBoard. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642626
Baxter, P., Bekkering, H., Dijkstra, T., Droop, M., van den Hurk, M., & Leoné, F. (2022). Contrasting orthographically similar words facilitates adult second language vocabulary learning. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101582
Bi, Y. (2021). Dual coding of knowledge in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(10), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.006
Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12617
Carioti, D., Masia, M. F., Travellini, S., & Berlingeri, M. (2021). Orthographic depth and developmental dyslexia: a meta-analytic study. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(3), 399–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00226-0
Chang, L.-Y., Tang, Y.-Y., Lee, C.-Y., & Chen, H.-C. (2022). The Effect of Visual Mnemonics and the Presentation of Character Pairs on Learning Visually Similar Characters for Chinese-As-Second-Language Learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 783898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.783898
Chen, H.-C., Kao, C.-H., Wang, T.-H., & Lai, Y.-T. (2022). Evaluation of children’s cognitive load in processing and storage of their spatial working memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 918048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918048
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2023). A Cognitive Load Theory Approach to Defining and Measuring Task Complexity Through Element Interactivity. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09782-w
Dilgard, C., Hodges, T. S., & Coleman, J. (2022). Phonics Instruction in Early Literacy: Examining Professional Learning, Instructional Resources, and Intervention Intensity. Reading Psychology, 43(8), 541–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2126045
Dixon, C., Oxley, E., Gellert, A. S., & Nash, H. (2023). Dynamic assessment as a predictor of reading development: a systematic review. Reading and Writing, 36(3), 673–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10312-3
Feekery, A. (2024). The 7 C’s framework for participatory action research: inducting novice participant-researchers. Educational Action Research, 32(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2234417
Ferguson, C., van den Broek, E. L., & van Oostendorp, H. (2022). AI-Induced guidance: Preserving the optimal Zone of Proximal Development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100089
Fernandes, T., Xavier, E., Domingues, M., & Araújo, S. (2022). Where is mirror invariance? Masked priming effects by mirrored and rotated transformations of reversible and nonreversible letters. Journal of Memory and Language, 127, 104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104375
Fischer, J.-P., & Luxembourger, C. (2021). A Test of Three Models of Character Reversal in Typically Developing Children’s Writing. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 719652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.719652
Fundelius, E., Wade, T., Robbins, A., Wang, S., McConomy, M. A., & Fumero, K. (2023). Universal Design Principles for Multimodal Representation in Literacy Activities for Preschoolers. Inclusive Practices, 2(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745221140380
Georgiou, G. K., Cho, J.-R., Deng, C., Altani, A., Romero, S., Kim, M.-Y., Wang, L., Wei, W., & Protopapas, A. (2022). Cascaded processing in naming and reading: Evidence from Chinese and Korean. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 220, 105416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105416
Gotlieb, R. J. M., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Gonzalez, E., Rhinehart, L., Mahjouri, S., Pueschel, E., & Nadaya, G. (2022). Becoming Literate: Educational Implications of Coordinated Neuropsychological Development of Reading and Social-Emotional Functioning Among Diverse Youth. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 71(1), 80–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377221120107
Greenberg, K., & Zheng, R. (2022). Cognitive load theory and its measurement: a study of secondary tasks in relation to working memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 34(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2022.2026052
Guay, F. (2022). Applying Self-Determination Theory to Education: Regulations Types, Psychological Needs, and Autonomy Supporting Behaviors. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211055355
Hulme, R. C., Shapiro, L. R., & Taylor, J. S. H. (2022). Learning new words through reading: do robust spelling–sound mappings boost learning of word forms and meanings? Royal Society Open Science, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210555
Jiang, N., & Wu, X. (2022). Orthographic Priming in Second‐Language Visual Word Recognition. Language Learning, 72(3), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12488
Ju, Y., Sambai, A., & Uno, A. (2022). The Influence of Orthographic Units Across Korean Children of Different Ages in Hangul Reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 797874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.797874
Lei, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2022). Learning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 984211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984211
Li, W., Yu, J., Zhang, Z., & Liu, X. (2022). Dual Coding or Cognitive Load? Exploring the Effect of Multimodal Input on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 834706. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834706
Li, Y., & Wang, M. (2023). A systematic review of orthographic learning via self-teaching. Educational Psychologist, 58(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2137673
Lyons, M. E. (2024). Within-Classroom Play: Cultivating Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness During the Transition to Kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(1), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01395-2
Martínez-García, C., Cuetos, F., & Suárez-Coalla, P. (2022). Same-different letter decision task: a study with Spanish children with dyslexia ( Tarea de decisión de letras igual-diferente: un estudio con niños españoles con dislexia ). Journal for the Study of Education and Development: Infancia y Aprendizaje, 45(4), 870–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2022.2096298
Mehta, N., Benjamin, J., Agrawal, A., Valanci, S., Masters, K., & MacNeill, H. (2026). Addressing educational overload with generative AI through dual coding and cognitive load theories. Medical Teacher, 48(7), 1113–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2543548
O’Brien, B. A., Seward, R., & Zhang, D. (2022). Multisensory Interactive Digital Text for English Phonics Instruction with Bilingual Beginning Readers. Education Sciences, 12(11), 750. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110750
Patro, K., Gross, A., & Friedrich, C. (2025). Spatial biases in processing mirror letters by literate subjects. Reading and Writing, 38(3), 821–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10529-4
Qiao, S., Chu, S. K. W., Shen, X., & Yeung, S. S. (2022). The impact of an online gamified approach embedded with self‐regulated learning support on students’ reading performance and intrinsic motivation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1379–1393. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12684
Rabgay, T., & Kidman, G. (2023). Multiple iterations and messiness in the implementation of action research by Bhutanese secondary science teachers. Discover Education, 2(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00077-4
Resque, D. P. da S., de Moura Lobato, A. M., da Silva, C. G., da Cruz Filho, D. A., da Fonseca, S. S. S., de Oliveira Matos, F., & Pereira, A. (2023). The inhibition of mirror generalization of letters in school-aged children. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 996012. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.996012
Rigopouli, K., Kotsifakos, D., & Psaromiligkos, Y. (2025). Vygotsky’s Creativity Options and Ideas in 21st-Century Technology-Enhanced Learning Design. Education Sciences, 15(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020257
Rouse, E., & Nicholas, M. (2025). Literacy learning in infant-toddler programs: Practice architectures as a lens for examining educator pedagogy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 25(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984221113170
Rubtsov, V. V., Isaev, E. I., & Konokotin, A. V. (2022). Learning Activity as The Zone of Proximal Development of Reflexive and Communicative Abilities of Children Aged 6—10 Years. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 18(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2022180103
Sarmiento-Campos, N.-V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E.-N., Cuellar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y.-L., Apaza, O. A., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). A Look at Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory (SCT): The Effectiveness of Scaffolding Method on EFL Learners’ Speaking Achievement. Education Research International, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514892
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2022). Understanding Cognitive Load in Digital and Online Learning: a New Perspective on Extraneous Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09624-7
Soares, A. P., Lages, A., Velho, M., Oliveira, H. M., & Hernández-Cabrera, J. (2021). The mirror reflects more for genial than for casual: right-asymmetry bias on the visual word recognition of words containing non-reversal letters. Reading and Writing, 34(6), 1467–1489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10100-x
Svrcek, N. S., & Abugasea Heidt, M. (2022). Beyond levels and labels: applying self‐determination theory to support readers. Literacy, 56(4), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12286
Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3
Sweller, J. (2024). Cognitive load theory and individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 110, 102423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102423
Sysoev, I., Gray, J. H., Fine, S., Makini, S. P., & Roy, D. (2022). Child-driven, machine-guided: Automatic scaffolding of constructionist-inspired early literacy play. Computers & Education, 182, 104434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104434
Teng, M. F. (2023). The effectiveness of multimedia input on vocabulary learning and retention. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(3), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2131791
Torres, A. R., Mota, N. B., Adamy, N., Naschold, A., Lima, T. Z., Copelli, M., Weissheimer, J., Pegado, F., & Ribeiro, S. (2021). Selective Inhibition of Mirror Invariance for Letters Consolidated by Sleep Doubles Reading Fluency. Current Biology, 31(4), 742-752.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.031
Valentín, A., Mateos, P. M., González-Tablas, M. M., & López, E. (2022). Effects of Teacher Enthusiasm and Type of Text on the Motivation and Achievement of Schoolchildren. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 842521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842521
Verhoeven, L., Voeten, M., & Keuning, J. (2022). Modeling developmental changes in print tuning in a transparent alphabetic orthography. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 934590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.934590
Wooten, J. O., & Cuevas, J. A. (2024). The Effects of Dual Coding Theory on Social Studies Vocabulary and Comprehension in Elementary Education. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 6(4), 673–691. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.696
Xodabande, I., Iravi, Y., Mansouri, B., & Matinparsa, H. (2022). Teaching Academic Words With Digital Flashcards: Investigating the Effectiveness of Mobile-Assisted Vocabulary Learning for University Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 893821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.893821
Yang, H., Reid, J. N., Kong, P., & Chen, J. (2022). Mirror Generalization During Early Word Recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 51(3), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09857-9
Zakian, M., Xodabande, I., Valizadeh, M., & Yousefvand, M. (2022). Out-of-the-classroom learning of English vocabulary by EFL learners: investigating the effectiveness of mobile assisted learning with digital flashcards. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00143-8
Zung, I., Imundo, M. N., & Pan, S. C. (2022). How do college students use digital flashcards during self-regulated learning? Memory, 30(8), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2058553
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
