Transforming STEM Education in Under-Resourced Contexts: A Conceptual Framework for AI-Supported OEP/Rs and Inquiry-Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v5i1.189Keywords:
Generative AI, Inquiry-Based Teaching, Interactive Digital Simulations, Lesson Design, STEM EducationAbstract
While digital innovation is rapidly transforming global classrooms, the pedagogical and resource divide in under-resourced STEM environments remains a critical barrier to equitable education. This conceptual paper aims to examine design-based practices (DBPs) for implementing Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported Open Educational Resources and Practices (OEP/Rs) to promote inquiry-led teaching in STEM education within under-resourced contexts. Guided by the Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) model, it explores how AI-supported digital simulations can be designed to enhance learner engagement and conceptual understanding. The methodology employs a critical and integrative literature review anchored in the 5E instructional framework to synthesize pedagogical benefits, implementation barriers, and design principles. The results present three adaptable teaching scenarios (natural science, technology, and mathematics) demonstrating how generative AI tools create curriculum-aligned, multilingual, and contextually relevant digital simulations. These findings show that AI-generated simulations successfully transform abstract concepts into interactive experiences, helping overcome infrastructural, linguistic, and contextual constraints in rural classrooms. The main contribution of this research lies in establishing a novel conceptual framework that bridges generative AI co-design with open pedagogy. It offers a scalable, cost-effective pathway for digital inclusion and equitable STEM education, providing actionable guidelines for educators to design localized digital learning objects without requiring advanced programming.
References
Abebe, A., Zeleke, T., & Melese, W. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning via 5E instructional model on students’ attitude toward learning history at secondary schools in Bonga town, Southwest Ethiopia. Discover Education, 4(1), 346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00739-5
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289
Admane, R., Sawale, P. S., Jayasree, R., Kurup, S. J., & Thomas, S. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Tailoring Curriculum to Individual Student Needs through AI-Based Systems. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(3).
Anderson, J. E., Nguyen, C. A., & Moreira, G. (2025). Generative AI-driven personalization of the Community of Inquiry model: enhancing individualized learning experiences in digital classrooms. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-10-2024-0240
Arifin, Z., Sukarmin, S., Saputro, S., & Kamari, A. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), em2592. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15988
Arispe, K., & Hoye, A. (2023). Partnering Higher Education and K–12 Institutions in OER: Foundations in Supporting Teacher OER-Enabled Pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.6856
Aulia, E. D., Burhanuddin, B., & Arifin, I. (2025). Analysis of Internal and External Factors Influencing Teacher Performance. Academia Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.11004
Baxter, G., & Hainey, T. (2024). Using immersive technologies to enhance the student learning experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0078
Botes, W. (2025). Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Reflections on Using Virtual Reality Open Educational Resources in Life Science Education. European Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/17192
Botes, W., & Philip, A. (2025). Enhancing Pedagogical Development of Natural Science Teachers Through a Key Concepts in Science Project: A Social Constructivist Perspective. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 10(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2025.11
Diab, H., Daher, W., Rayan, B., Issa, N., & Rayan, A. (2024). Transforming Science Education in Elementary Schools: The Power of PhET Simulations in Enhancing Student Learning. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(11), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8110105
Eti, N., Mosia, M., & Egara, F. O. (2026). The role of AI-driven personalised learning in enhancing mathematics problem-solving skills: a systematic review. Frontiers in Computer Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2026.1813431
Gomez, M. J. (2025). The Impact of Inquiry-Based Learning in Science Education: A Systematic Review of Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(2), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i2.1143
Guler, T. (2025). The impact of scenario-based learning on the scientific creativity and reflective thinking skills of fourth-grade students in primary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(2), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.271
Gurmu, F., Tuge, C., & Hunde, A. B. (2024). Effects of GeoGebra-assisted instructional methods on students’ conceptual understanding of geometry. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2379745
Harrison, M. (2025). Student Perceptions of Open Education Practice: Navigating Privacy, Identity, and Collaboration with Participatory Technologies. Open Praxis, 17(4), 664–679. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.4.909
Hou, Y., Wang, M., He, W., Ling, Y., Zheng, J., & Hou, X. (2023). Virtual Simulation Experiments: A Teaching Option for Complex and Hazardous Chemistry Experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(4), 1437–1445. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00594
Huang, X., Lo, C. K., He, J., Chen, G., & Tlili, A. (2026). Video-based online mathematics instruction with GeoGebra: a visual learning analytics-supported study to enhance open educational resources and practices. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1811676
Kgosi, A. M. (2025). Enhancing the teaching of functions in the FET phase in the South African context: A critical review of digital tools and AI-driven methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 11(02), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.17501/24246700.2025.11203
Khair, N. S. M. M., & Sukumaran, S. (2025). Addressing Accessibility Issues in Language Education Through Open Educational Resources, Technology, and Culturally Responsive Pedagogies. In D. Mishra (Ed.), Technology Driven Language Learning: Innovations and Applications (pp. 147–165). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77232-0_9
Kotsis, K. T., Gikopoulou, O., Patrinopoulos, M., Kapotis, E., & Kalkanis, G. T. (2025). The new Greek inquiry-based learning science curriculum for primary education. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 5(3), em083. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/16846
Kuncoro, K. S., Fitriasari, P., Erlangga, S. Y., Ario, M., & Kartika, D. L. (2026). Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Tutoring Systems in Mathematics Education: A Bibliometric Analysis (2001–2025). F1000Research, 15, 107. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.176098.1
Kunnath, A. J., & Botes, W. (2025). Transforming science education with artificial intelligence: Enhancing inquiry-based learning and critical thinking in South African science classrooms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(6), em2655. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16532
Laubscher, D., Bosch, C., & Mdakane, M. M. (2026). Empowering self-directed learners through digital innovation and open educational practices. AOSIS. https://books.aosis.co.za/index.php/ob/catalog/book/546
Li, T., Krajcik, J. S., & Spiro, R. (2025). The Transformative Collaboration of Human Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence in Designing Knowledge-in-Use Science Assessment for Learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10275-4
Mahlo, L., & Waghid, Z. (2023). Exploring information and communication technology integration among teachers in township public primary schools. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2160
Menzli, L. J., Smirani, L. K., Boulahia, J. A., & Hadjouni, M. (2022). Investigation of open educational resources adoption in higher education using Rogers’ diffusion of innovation theory. Heliyon, 8(7), e09885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09885
Mhlongo, S., Mbatha, K., Ramatsetse, B., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon, 9(6), e16348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348
Morris, D. L. (2025). Rethinking Science Education Practices: Shifting from Investigation-Centric to Comprehensive Inquiry-Based Instruction. Education Sciences, 15(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010073
Negahban, A. (2024). Simulation in engineering education: The transition from physical experimentation to digital immersive simulated environments. SIMULATION, 100(7), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497241229757
Nualjan, T., & Panjaburee, P. (2025). Engaging Young Learners in STEM through Virtual Reality and Hands-on Activities: A Case Study in Primary Classrooms. Science Education International, 36(4), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v36.i4.5
Nzomo, C. M., Rugano, P., Njoroge, J. M., & Gitonga, C. M. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and students’ self-efficacy in Chemistry among secondary schools in Kenya. Heliyon, 9(1), e12672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12672
Otto, D., & Kerres, M. (2022). Increasing Sustainability in Open Learning: Prospects of a Distributed Learning Ecosystem for Open Educational Resources. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.866917
Park, Y., Moon, J., & Na, H. (2025). Elementary STEM Teachers’ Open Educational Resources and TPACK in a Professional Learning Network: A Case Study. Online Learning, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i1.4102
Pei, Z. (2025). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry-based learning (IBL) on students’ academic achievement. Research Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.62583/rseltl.v3i3.89
Polanin, J. R., Austin, M., Taylor, J. A., Steingut, R. R., Rodgers, M. A., & Williams, R. (2024). Effects of the 5E Instructional Model: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241269866
Porat, E., Shamir‐Inbal, T., & Blau, I. (2023). Teaching prototypes and pedagogical strategies in integrating Open Sim‐based virtual worlds in K‐12: Insights from perspectives and practices of teachers and students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(4), 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12786
Salman, A. (2023). Field Trips and Their Effect on Student Learning: A Comparison of Knowledge Assessment for Physical versus Virtual Field Trips in a Construction Management Course. Virtual Worlds, 2(3), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds2030017
Sam, R. (2024). Systematic review of inquiry-based learning: assessing impact and best practices in education. F1000Research, 13, 1045. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.155367.1
Serrano-Ausejo, E., & Mårell-Olsson, E. (2024). Opportunities and challenges of using immersive technologies to support students’ spatial ability and 21st-century skills in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5571–5597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11981-5
Singh-Pillay, A. (2024). Exploring Science and Technology Teachers’ Experiences with Integrating Simulation-Based Learning. Education Sciences, 14(8), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080803
Sun, Y., Yan, Z., & Wu, B. (2022). How differently designed guidance influences simulation‐based inquiry learning in science education: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 960–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12667
Tene, T., Guevara, M., Moreano, G., Vera, J., & Vacacela Gomez, C. (2024). The Role of Immersive Virtual Realities: Enhancing Science Learning in Higher Education. Emerging Science Journal, 8, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2024-SIED1-06
Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Trust, T., Maloy, R. W., & Edwards, S. (2023). College student engagement in OER design projects: Impacts on attitudes, motivation, and learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221081454
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and Generative AI: Possibilities for Its Contribution to Lesson Planning, Critical Thinking and Openness in Teacher Education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998
Wahidin, W., Gutierrez, G., Osman, K., Akkapin, S., & Tan, M. L. T. (2025). Digital Simulations in Science Learning: A Student Perspective on Interactive, Engagement, Conceptual Understanding, and Learning Satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research, 4(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v4i1.138
Zabasta, A., Kazymyr, V., Drozd, O., Verslype, S., Espeel, L., & Bruzgiene, R. (2024). Development of Shared Modeling and Simulation Environment for Sustainable e-Learning in the STEM Field. Sustainability, 16(5), 2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052197
Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R. (2022). Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics. Mathematics, 10(3), 398. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
