Data Saturation in Digital Qualitative Interviews: A Critical Review of Influencing Factors and Methodological Rigor in Educational Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58418/ijeqqr.v5i1.172Keywords:
Data Saturation, Digital Qualitative Interview, Methodological Rigor, Educational Research, Interactive Learning RevolutionAbstract
Data saturation remains a fundamental yet heavily debated methodological principle in qualitative inquiry due to persistent subjectivism and methodological laxity, a challenge that has intensified with the contemporary transition toward digital and virtual interview modalities. This study examines and contextualizes the critical factors influencing data saturation when digital qualitative interviews are deployed within educational research. Utilizing a critical literature review design, a thematic analysis was conducted on 18 international peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025 to systematically identify the determinants of data sufficiency in interview-based data collection. The synthesis revealed six primary factors that dictate methodological rigor within virtual educational research environments, including data quality and thickness, the scope and complexity of the research, sampling strategies, the design of research questions and interview guides, the digital-pedagogical skills of the interviewer, and the homogeneity or diversity of the participants. Ultimately, this paper contributes a robust methodological control framework that enables educational researchers to validly operationalize data adequacy indicators, thereby mitigating the risk of premature data saturation when evaluating interactive learning systems and digital educational environments.
References
Abedi, E. A. (2025). Internet-mediated phone interviews for remote qualitative educational research in the Global South during COVID–19: a researcher’s and participants’ experiential reflections. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 28(5), 525–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2024.2421766
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Ahmed, S. K. (2025). Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 5, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100171
Alam, M. K. (2020). A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-09-2019-1825
Aldiabat, K., & Le Navenec, C.-L. (2018). Data Saturation: The Mysterious Step In Grounded Theory Method. The Qualitative Report, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994
Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Grounded Theory and Phenomenology. In A. Almusaed, A. Almssad, & I. Yitmen (Eds.), Practice of Research Methodology in Civil Engineering and Architecture: A Comprehensive Guide (pp. 355–387). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_11
Baker, R. S., Hutt, S., Bosch, N., Ocumpaugh, J., Biswas, G., Paquette, L., Andres, J. M. A., Nasiar, N., & Munshi, A. (2024). Detector-driven classroom interviewing: focusing qualitative researcher time by selecting cases in situ. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2841–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10324-y
Bekmezci, M., & Sürücü, L. (2025). Determining Validity, Reliability, and Sample Size in Qualitative Research. PaperASIA, 41(4b), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v41i4b.545
Bouncken, R. B., Czakon, W., & Schmitt, F. (2026). Purposeful sampling and saturation in qualitative research methodologies: recommendations and review. Review of Managerial Science, 20(2), 579–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00881-2
Brunton, G., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2020). Innovations in framework synthesis as a systematic review method. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1399
Bryda, G., & Costa, A. P. (2023). Qualitative Research in Digital Era: Innovations, Methodologies and Collaborations. Social Sciences, 12(10), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12100570
Buckley, J., Adams, L., Aribilola, I., Arshad, I., Azeem, M., Bracken, L., Breheny, C., Buckley, C., Chimello, I., Fagan, A., Fitzpatrick, D. P., Garza Herrera, D., Gomes, G. D., Grassick, S., Halligan, E., Hirway, A., Hyland, T., Imtiaz, M. B., Khan, M. B., … Zhang, L. (2022). An assessment of the transparency of contemporary technology education research employing interview-based methodologies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(4), 1963–1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09695-1
Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Peña-Becerril, M., Cuevas-Cancino, M. de la O., & Avilés-Rabanales, E. G. (2023). Gains from the transition from face-to-face to digital/online modality to improve education in emergency. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1197396
Chadee, M., Chadee, D., & Kostić, A. (2024). Investigative Interviewing: Implications for Nonverbal Behaviour. In D. Chadee & A. Kostić (Eds.), Body Language Communication (pp. 355–376). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70064-4_14
Cresswell, K., Domínguez Hernández, A., Williams, R., & Sheikh, A. (2022). Key Challenges and Opportunities for Cloud Technology in Health Care: Semistructured Interview Study. JMIR Human Factors, 9(1), e31246. https://doi.org/10.2196/31246
Daher, W. (2023). Saturation in Qualitative Educational Technology Research. Education Sciences, 13(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020098
de Villiers, C., Farooq, M. B., & Molinari, M. (2022). Qualitative research interviews using online video technology – challenges and opportunities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), 1764–1782. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1252
DiStefano, A. S., & Yang, J. S. (2024). Sample Size and Saturation: A Three-phase Method for Ethnographic Research with Multiple Qualitative Data Sources. Field Methods, 36(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X231194515
Fan, H., Li, B., Pasaribu, T., & Chowdhury, R. (2024). Online Interviews as New Methodological Normalcy and a Space of Ethics: An Autoethnographic Investigation into Covid-19 Educational Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 30(3–4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231176283
Fusch, P., & Ness, L. (2015). Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281
Gandy, K. (2024). How many interviews or focus groups are enough? Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 24(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X241266964
Geng, W., Zhou, C., & Bian, Y. (2024). Change gently: an agent-based virtual interview training for college students with great shyness. Virtual Reality, 29(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-01076-y
Guest, G., Namey, E., & Chen, M. (2020). A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232076. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076
Hadley, L. V., Naylor, G., & Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2022). A review of theories and methods in the science of face-to-face social interaction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00008-w
Hakimi, L., Eynon, R., & Murphy, V. A. (2021). The Ethics of Using Digital Trace Data in Education: A Thematic Review of the Research Landscape. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 671–717. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211020116
Heiselberg, L., & Stępińska, A. (2023). Transforming Qualitative Interviewing Techniques for Video Conferencing Platforms. Digital Journalism, 11(7), 1353–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2047083
Hennink, M. M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344
Hoter, E., Yazbak Abu Ahmad, M., & Azulay, H. (2024). Enhancing Language Learning and Intergroup Empathy through Multi-User Interactions and Simulations in a Virtual World. Virtual Worlds, 3(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds3030018
Howlett, M. (2022). Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
Huff, J. L., & Brooks, A. L. (2024). The Interview Quality Reflection Tool (IQRT): Honing the Craft of Experiential Interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241300989
Hwang, E., Kirkham, R., Marshall, K., Kharrufa, A., & Olivier, P. (2023). Sketching dialogue: incorporating sketching in empathetic semi-Structured interviews for human-computer interaction research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(13), 2226–2254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2113431
Janis, I. (2022). Strategies for Establishing Dependability between Two Qualitative Intrinsic Case Studies: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Field Methods, 34(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211069636
Jarrahi, M. H. (2025). Interviewing AI: Using qualitative methods to explore and capture machines’ characteristics and behaviors. Big Data & Society, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251381697
Keen, S., Lomeli-Rodriguez, M., & Joffe, H. (2022). From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221105075
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Lu, J., Schmidt, M., Lee, M., & Huang, R. (2022). Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(6), 1951–1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10152-6
Mahajan, P. (2026). What is ethical: AIHED driving humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A conceptual framework enabling the ‘ethos’ of AI-driven higher education. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2026.2678591
Maher, A. J. (2025). Rigour in interpretive qualitative research in education: Ideas to think with. British Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 2099–2115. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4156
Malviya, S., Tandoc, E., & Li, B. J. (2026). Coping with Techno-Stressors: A Qualitative Insight into Employee Videoconferencing Experiences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 42(3), 1693–1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2526571
Matos, J. F., Piedade, J., Freitas, A., Pedro, N., Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Galego, C. (2023). Teaching and Learning Research Methodologies in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020173
Matta, C. (2022). Philosophical Paradigms in Qualitative Research Methods Education: What is their Pedagogical Role? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(6), 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1958372
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
Mpofu, F. Y. (2025). The Saturation Dilemma Reconsidered: Role, Challenges and Controversies for Qualitative Research in the Digital Era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251348542
Mpofu, F. Y., & Sibanda, B. S. (2026). The Sample Size Adequacy-Saturation Conundrum in Digital Qualitative Research. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i2.3107
Mwilongo, N. (2025). Understanding Sampling Techniques and Determining Sample Size in Qualitative Research. A Novice Guide. Eminent Journal of Social Sciences, 1(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.70582/shdhga10
Mwilongo, N., Kamugisha, D., & Kilugwe, Z. (2024). Research and publication at crossroads: exploring the catalysts of ethical misconducts of scholarly work. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 13(5), 914–922. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i5.3394
Mwita, K. (2022). Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(4), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1776
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2024). Demystification and Actualisation of Data Saturation in Qualitative Research Through Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241229777
Naidu, S., Saurombe, M. D., & Mogoai, D. V. (2026). Evaluating the benefits and drawbacks of virtual interviewing from the candidate’s experience. Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1602298
Oates, M., Crichton, K., Cranor, L., Budwig, S., Weston, E. J. L., Bernagozzi, B. M., & Pagaduan, J. (2022). Audio, video, chat, email, or survey: How much does online interview mode matter? PLOS ONE, 17(2), e0263876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263876
Ouhaichi, H., Bahtijar, V., & Spikol, D. (2024). Exploring design considerations for multimodal learning analytics systems: an interview study. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1356537
Panyasai, P., & Ambele, E. A. (2025). Developing Interview Guide in Qualitative Research: Problems and Solutions from a Needs Analysis Doctoral Study. REFLections, 32(1), 576–594. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.280411
Peters, H. C. (2023). A-Methodological Saturation: A Grounded Theory Analysis. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(7), 933–969. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231179706
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Rahimi, S., & Khatooni, M. (2024). Saturation in qualitative research: An evolutionary concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 6, 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174
Saavedra, D. (2022). Responding to Technological Disruptions During Online Video Interviews Conducted Via Zoom. The Qualitative Report, 27(6), 1479–1484. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5524
Samuel, A., & Merkebu, J. (2026). Exploring Sampling Strategies to Maximize Qualitative Research Studies in Adult Education. Adult Learning, 37(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595251349183
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Silva, J. C. R. A. da, & Capucho, H. C. (2021). Virtual consent and the use of electronic informed consent form in clinical research in Brazil. Revista Da Associação Médica Brasileira, 67(11), 1570–1574. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20210621
Squire, C. M., Giombi, K. C., Rupert, D. J., Amoozegar, J., & Williams, P. (2024). Determining an Appropriate Sample Size for Qualitative Interviews to Achieve True and Near Code Saturation: Secondary Analysis of Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26, e52998. https://doi.org/10.2196/52998
Stuckey, H. (2013). Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social health. Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, 01(02), 056–059. https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-0656.115294
Subrahmanyam, S. (2025). Qualitative Research Designs in Higher Education. In Social Implications of Research in Higher Education (pp. 263–296). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0654-4.ch010
Tafese, M. B., & Kopp, E. (2025). Embedding Social Sustainability in Education: A Thematic Review of Practices and Trends Across Educational Pathways from a Global Perspective. Sustainability, 17(10), 4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104342
Thomson, S. B. (2011). Sample Size and Grounded Theory. JOAAG, 5(1), 45–52.
Waugh, K. (2023). Failing to Connect? Methodological Reflections on Video-Call Interviewing during the Pandemic. The Oral History Review, 50(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940798.2023.2178316
Weller, S. C., Vickers, B., Bernard, H. R., Blackburn, A. M., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C. C., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198606. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198606
Zhao, P., & Li, P. (2023). The Affordances of Videoconferencing Technology for Doing Interviews With Children Online: Methodological Explorations Based on a Critical Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 29(10), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231165464
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Educational Qualitative Quantitative Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
